Although I didn't see myself on the leaderboard this week, there might be some recognition issues, but I still firmly believe in @ZKVProtocol. Why? Because its logic is very clear. First of all, this is a universal proof verification layer. It sounds a bit abstract, but it actually means something very simple: no matter whether you are using SNARK, STARK, or Groth16, all proofs can be verified here, and the cost is over 90% cheaper than traditional L1. Looking at the ecosystem: it has already partnered with ApeChain, Arbitrum, Ankr, Phala, and zkEmail. All the projects that can collaborate are technically sound. The most critical point: this is not just a story-telling track. Verifying proofs is a fundamental need that blockchain cannot avoid. ZKV takes this demand to the extreme, which is equivalent to a "selling water business." So my own judgment is: from a fundamental perspective, ZKV has technical barriers and collaborative implementation; from a market opportunity...
Show original
6.21K
47
The content on this page is provided by third parties. Unless otherwise stated, OKX is not the author of the cited article(s) and does not claim any copyright in the materials. The content is provided for informational purposes only and does not represent the views of OKX. It is not intended to be an endorsement of any kind and should not be considered investment advice or a solicitation to buy or sell digital assets. To the extent generative AI is utilized to provide summaries or other information, such AI generated content may be inaccurate or inconsistent. Please read the linked article for more details and information. OKX is not responsible for content hosted on third party sites. Digital asset holdings, including stablecoins and NFTs, involve a high degree of risk and can fluctuate greatly. You should carefully consider whether trading or holding digital assets is suitable for you in light of your financial condition.